Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs

[KOSAKI Motohiro]

> > +	int node = numa_node_id();
> > +	struct zone *zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones;
> > +	int num_cpus_on_node;
> > +	node_to_cpumask_ptr(cpumask_on_node, node);
> >  
> >  	node_free_pages =
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> > @@ -38,6 +41,10 @@ static unsigned long max_pages(unsigned 
> >  		zone_page_state(&zones[ZONE_NORMAL], NR_FREE_PAGES);
> >  
> >  	max = node_free_pages / FRACTION_OF_NODE_MEM;
> > +
> > +	num_cpus_on_node = cpus_weight_nr(*cpumask_on_node);
> > +	max /= num_cpus_on_node;
> > +
> >  	return max(max, min_pages);
> 
> Exactly!  And (many thanks to them!) the sparc maintainers have
> implemented a similar internal function definition for node_to_cpumask_ptr().

Can I think get your Ack?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/