Re: cpufreq doesn't seem to work in Intel Q9300

[Arjan van de Ven]

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:03:46 +0300
Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:11:28AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >...
> > so before you had for one second "20% expensive, 80% low power" 
> > now you have for one second "20% expensive, 20% throttle power, 60%
> > low power"
> > 
> > since throttle power is higher than low/idle power.. you lose.
> 
> So what is the intended use case?
>

it's thermal throttling.
To forcefully reduce the number of cycles that have the full "execute"
power in order to clamp the temperature if the cpu is too hot.

> 
> There must be a reason why Intels CPUs support this throttling?


yes there is.. for cases where there is overtemperature. Think of it as
the emergency break in the subway. You really don't want to use it but
when you need it you're glad it's there.


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/