Re: [PATCH] Make PFN_PHYS return a properly-formed physical address

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:45:12 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Shall we go with just using plain u64 (or unsigned long long if we want 
> a really consistent type) in the meantime, and then waffle about 
> introducing a new type everywhere?
> 
> Or we could redefine resource_size_t to be big enough to refer to any 
> resource, including all memory.  It's close to being that anyway.

We could do

	typedef resource_size_t jeremy_thing_t;

for now and worry about it later if the need arises, perhaps.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/