Re: does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist?

[Rene Herman]

On 06-08-08 00:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
>
> #define INITCALLS                                                       \
>         *(.initcallearly.init)                                          \
>         VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__early_initcall_end) = .;                       \
>         *(.initcall0.init)                                              \
>         *(.initcall0s.init)                                             \
>         *(.initcall1.init)                                              \
>         *(.initcall1s.init)                                             \
> ... etc ...
>
>   but from include/linux/init.h:
>
> #define pure_initcall(fn)               __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
>
> #define core_initcall(fn)               __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
> #define core_initcall_sync(fn)          __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
> #define postcore_initcall(fn)           __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
> #define postcore_initcall_sync(fn)      __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
>
>   i don't see any initcalls of level "0s".  in any event, might it not
> be cleaner to have these files sync up?  no big deal, of course.  i'm
> well aware that it doesn't break anything.

Last I heard, all sync levels were on their way out (Arjan).

Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/