[PATCH 10/14] uml: stub needs to tolerate SIGWINCH

From: Jeff Dike
Date: Tue Aug 05 2008 - 16:19:29 EST


>From 3d5ede6f776bdb1483bcd086f79c3bf41fed3865

We lost the marking of SIGWINCH as being OK to receive during stub
execution, causing a panic should that happen.

Cc: Benedict Verheyen <benedict.verheyen@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
index 1e8cba6..2328098 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/skas/process.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static int ptrace_dump_regs(int pid)
* Signals that are OK to receive in the stub - we'll just continue it.
* SIGWINCH will happen when UML is inside a detached screen.
*/
-#define STUB_SIG_MASK (1 << SIGVTALRM)
+#define STUB_SIG_MASK ((1 << SIGVTALRM) | (1 << SIGWINCH))

/* Signals that the stub will finish with - anything else is an error */
#define STUB_DONE_MASK (1 << SIGTRAP)
--
1.5.5.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/