Re: kbuild now support arch/$ARCH/include - time for ARCHs to convert

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 July 2008 06:05:00 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > is is suggested to move the arch specific files under arch/
> > and for the header files this is arch/$ARCH/include.
> 
> Well, it would have been nice to take the opportunity to separate user-visible 
> header files and non-user-visible files.  We could have left the user-visible 
> ones in place, for example: diffstat would then show when you were frobbing 
> the userspace interface.
> 
> But I'm guessing noone wants even more marginal-value churn right now.
> Rusty.

That actually sounds like a good idea to me!
Can we do the same with the <linux/*.h> ones?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/