Re: [patch 01/25] ftrace: remove unneeded documentation

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Greg KH wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:42:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > > 2.6.26-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> > 
> > Well, I object to this patch, but I'm sure I'll be ignored.
> 
> Why?  There is no ftrace code in the 2.6.26 kernel, so why would we
> worry about keeping such documentation up to date, let alone even
> present at all?
> 
> Why should this matter?

Greg,

Don't get me wrong. I agree with the reason to pull it. It is the right 
thing to do. But still, I don't like it, not because I disagree with it, 
but simply, I liked the fact that the document made it in before the code.

I just sold my 1994 Nissan Sentra because I seldom drove it. It was the 
right thing to do. But I still don't like the fact that I don't have it 
anymore.

I don't like it. This is a feeling. Nothing to do with being technical. 
Hence, I will not argue it.  I just want it on record that I do not 
_like_ it. ;-)

My objection was only symbolic.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/