Re: No, really, stop trying to delete slab until you've finished making slub perform as well
From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Mon Aug 04 2008 - 12:47:56 EST
Hi
> Could you address the performance issues in different ways? F.e. try to free
> when the object is hot or free from multiple processors? SLAB has to take the
> list_lock rather frequently under high concurrent loads (depends on queue
> size). That will not occur with SLUB. So you actually can free (and allocate)
> concurrently with high performance.
just information. (offtopic?)
When hackbench running, SLUB consume memory very largely than SLAB.
then, SLAB often outperform SLUB in memory stavation state.
I don't know why memory comsumption different.
Anyone know it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/