Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH 13/13] viafb: via_utility.c,via_utility.h, vt1636.c, vt1636.h

[Harald Welte]

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:44:07AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> I think at this point however the code is in a state where it would be
> more productive to merge it and then fix up the remaining smaller details
> than keep going round back to VIA to change it internally and return.

Well, I'm obviously not having any unbiased opinion on this anymore...
... but have a vital interest in getting this driver merged ;)

Joseph: Can you please give me an update about what the current state
of this driver merge is?  This message is the last one that I can find
ont this subject on linux-fbdev-devel, and it's already one month old.

Joseph: If there was any further work on this since your last
13-patch-posting in June, can you please provide me with the latest
driver patchset?  I'd be happy to help in cleaning this further up and
finally getting it mainline.

Thanks to everyone involved,
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature