Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH] ath5k : ath5k_config_interface deadlockfix

[Alan Jenkins]

Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Bob Copeland napsal(a):
>   
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:03:37 +0300 Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Dave Young napsal(a):
>>>>>           
>>>>>> In the drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c, there's recursive locking of
>>>>>> sc->lock
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Should be fixed already:
>>>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=bc05116ab33d30342e2b4b1bcc6d6e1184e9df97
>>>>>           
>>>> I guess that didn't make it to -stable?
>>>>         
>>> (cc stable!)
>>>       
>> Not to worry, the commit that introduced it was
>> 9d139c810a2aa17365cc548d0cd2a189d8433c65, which as far as I can tell
>> came in after 2.6.26.
>>     
>
> git-describe 9d139c810a2aa17365cc548d0cd2a189d8433c65
> v2.6.26-rc8-1219-g9d139c8
>
>   
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Bob Copeland napsal(a):
>   
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:14 AM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:03:37 +0300 Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Dave Young napsal(a):
>>>>>           
>>>>>> In the drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c, there's recursive locking of
>>>>>> sc->lock
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Should be fixed already:
>>>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=bc05116ab33d30342e2b4b1bcc6d6e1184e9df97
>>>>>           
>>>> I guess that didn't make it to -stable?
>>>>         
>>> (cc stable!)
>>>       
>> Not to worry, the commit that introduced it was
>> 9d139c810a2aa17365cc548d0cd2a189d8433c65, which as far as I can tell
>> came in after 2.6.26.
>>     
>
> git-describe 9d139c810a2aa17365cc548d0cd2a189d8433c65
> v2.6.26-rc8-1219-g9d139c8
>   
Unfortunately git-describe can be misleading.

All this tells you is that the commit in question was based on (a
descendant of) v2.6.26-rc8.  It doesn't tell you whether the patch is
present in v2.6.26.

There must be a better way (for efficient merges, right?).  But all I
can think of is comparing the files in question against the diff.  I
checked myself and the changes don't appear to have been included in
v2.6.26.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/