[PATCH] amd64-agp: run fallback when no bridges found,not when driver registration fails

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Tue Jul 29 2008 - 18:01:40 EST



I think the intent was that if no bridges matched agp_amd64_pci_table[],
we would fall back to checking for any bridge with the AGP capability.
But in the current code, we execute the fallback path only when
pci_register_driver() itself fails, which is unrelated to whether any
matching devices were found.

This patch counts the AGP bridges found in the probe() method and
executes the fallback path when none is found.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx>
---

drivers/char/agp/amd64-agp.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/amd64-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/amd64-agp.c
index 481ffe8..7345f9a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/agp/amd64-agp.c
+++ b/drivers/char/agp/amd64-agp.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@

static struct resource *aperture_resource;
static int __initdata agp_try_unsupported = 1;
+static int agp_bridges_found;

static void amd64_tlbflush(struct agp_memory *temp)
{
@@ -489,6 +490,7 @@ static int __devinit agp_amd64_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
{
struct agp_bridge_data *bridge;
u8 cap_ptr;
+ int err;

cap_ptr = pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_AGP);
if (!cap_ptr)
@@ -536,7 +538,12 @@ static int __devinit agp_amd64_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
}

pci_set_drvdata(pdev, bridge);
- return agp_add_bridge(bridge);
+ err = agp_add_bridge(bridge);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ agp_bridges_found++;
+ return 0;
}

static void __devexit agp_amd64_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
@@ -713,7 +720,11 @@ int __init agp_amd64_init(void)

if (agp_off)
return -EINVAL;
- if (pci_register_driver(&agp_amd64_pci_driver) < 0) {
+ err = pci_register_driver(&agp_amd64_pci_driver);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
+
+ if (agp_bridges_found == 0) {
struct pci_dev *dev;
if (!agp_try_unsupported && !agp_try_unsupported_boot) {
printk(KERN_INFO PFX "No supported AGP bridge found.\n");

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/