[PATCH] omfs: fix sparse signedness warnings

[Harvey Harrison]

fs/omfs/bitmap.c:74:18: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness)
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:74:18:    expected unsigned long volatile *addr
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:74:18:    got long *<noident>
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:77:20: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness)
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:77:20:    expected unsigned long volatile *addr
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:77:20:    got long *<noident>
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:112:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness)
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:112:17:    expected unsigned long volatile *addr
fs/omfs/bitmap.c:112:17:    got long *<noident>

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Sorry, missed these in my other sparse warning fixes, feel free to fold it
with the other one.

 fs/omfs/bitmap.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/omfs/bitmap.c b/fs/omfs/bitmap.c
index dc75f22..697663b 100644
--- a/fs/omfs/bitmap.c
+++ b/fs/omfs/bitmap.c
@@ -71,10 +71,10 @@ static int set_run(struct super_block *sb, int map,
 		}
 		if (set) {
 			set_bit(bit, sbi->s_imap[map]);
-			set_bit(bit, (long *) bh->b_data);
+			set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)bh->b_data);
 		} else {
 			clear_bit(bit, sbi->s_imap[map]);
-			clear_bit(bit, (long *) bh->b_data);
+			clear_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)bh->b_data);
 		}
 	}
 	mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ int omfs_allocate_block(struct super_block *sb, u64 block)
 		if (!bh)
 			goto out;
 
-		set_bit(bit, (long *) bh->b_data);
+		set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)bh->b_data);
 		mark_buffer_dirty(bh);
 		brelse(bh);
 	}
-- 
1.6.0.rc1.154.ge3fc



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/