Re: 2.6.26-<mumble> question regarding kernel/lockdep.c

[Ingo Molnar]

* Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I was chasing after some weird behavior with lockdep, and I found that
> almost none of the printk() calls in kernel/lockdep.c have a KERN_FOO
> level specified.
> 
> It looks like it could use patching, but before I code something, I
> need to know if the patch should be doing:
> 
> a) Adding the missing KERN_FOO levels..
> or
> b) Adding a comment explaining the subtle reason they're not there...

i guess most could/should be converted to pr_info() - and a couple of 
them need to be KERN_CONT.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/