Re: [PATCH] x86: APIC: Remove apic_write_around(); use alternatives

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > maciej, patch will go first, and x2apic will goes later, so bisect 
> > > on x2apic will be broken.
> > 
> > hm, ok. Ingo? should I send the rebased 30 or so patches. or we can 
> > move this patch later.
> 
> hm, yes, please send the rebased patches - as this stuff has some 
> risks so bisectability is important.

hm, actually - the order is correct so no need to rebase any of this.

We've got two topics: tip/x86/apic and tip/x86/x2apic.

both tip/x86/x2apic and tip/x86/apic were OK standalone. I merged them 
together in this commit:

commit 453c1404c5273a30d715e5a83372a78cff70b6d9
Merge: a208f37... 35b6805...
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jul 18 23:00:05 2008 +0200

    Merge branch 'x86/apic' into x86/x2apic

    Conflicts:

        arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
        arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
        arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c
        arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
        arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
        include/asm-x86/apic.h
        include/asm-x86/paravirt.h

    Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

and that didnt work straight away, so i applied your fixups - but that's 
the next commit. So there's only a single commit that is not bisectable 
and that's OK.

so unless there's some other breakage i missed, this should be fine and 
no need to resend/rebase anything.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/