Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flushrequirements

[Daniel Walker]

On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 20:24 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> 
> Then leave them as semaphores.  Really.
> 

Are you saying you want to keep semaphores? Cause I think that goes
against the overall agenda that I've seen, which is complete semaphore
removal .. If you have issues with the removal method then we could
change that ..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/