Re: When did High-Resolution Timers hit mainline?

From: Michael Kerrisk
Date: Wed Jun 25 2008 - 08:20:37 EST


Thomas,

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>> High-Resolution Timers
>> Before Linux 2.6.16, the accuracy of timer and sleep system
>> calls (see below) was also limited by the size of the jiffy.
>>
>> Since Linux 2.6.16, Linux supports high-resolution timers
>> (HRTs), optionally configurable since kernel 2.6.21 via CON-
>> FIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS. On a system that supports HRTs, the accu-
>> racy of sleep and timer system calls is no longer constrained
>> by the jiffy, but instead can be as accurate as the hardware
>> allows (microsecond accuracy is typical of modern hardware).
>
> Hmm, that's a bit backwards. We changed the internal handling of those
> interfaces to hrtimers in 2.6.16, but the accuracy is still jiffies
> unless you have CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS enabled (which is only possible
> as of 2.6.21) and your system provides the necessary hardware.

So then it's simply enough to say:

Since Linux 2.6.17, Linux optionaly supports high-resolution timers
(configurable via CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS).

right?

>> HRTs are not supported on all hardware architectures. (Support
>> is provided on x86, arm, and powerpc, among others.)
>
> Also you might point out that you can check whether high resolution
> timers are active via clock_getres() or by checking the resolution
> entry in /proc/timer_list.

Okay -- thanks.

Cheers,

Michael

--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/