Re: configfs: Q: item leak in a failing configfs_attach_group()?

From: Joel Becker
Date: Tue Jun 24 2008 - 13:11:35 EST


On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 04:16:49PM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like an opinion on the following scenario:
>
> process 1: process 2:
> configfs_mkdir("A")
> attach_group("A")
> attach_item("A")
> d_instantiate("A")
> populate_groups("A")
> mutex_lock("A")
> attach_group("A/B")
> attach_item("A")
> d_instantiate("A/B")
> mkdir("A/B/C")
> do_path_lookup("A/B/C", LOOKUP_PARENT)

This has to sleep until
configfs_mkdir("A") finishes.
It's waiting on A->d_parent's
i_mutex, which is held by
sys_mkdirat().

Joel

--

"Sometimes one pays most for the things one gets for nothing."
- Albert Einstein

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx
Phone: (650) 506-8127
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/