Re: [patch 12/21] perfmon2 minimal: sysfs interface

[stephane eranian]

Greg,



On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 5:53 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 02:54:15PM +0200, stephane eranian wrote:
>>
>> In any case, let me know if there are still things that must be
>> changed/simplified in my file.
>
> This looks much better.  I wonder if you could use the "default" kobject
> attributes, which might allow you to remove some of your show/store
> wrappers, but in general, it's much better than before.
>
Well, I wondered about that myself, but I think I am missing one piece.
The difference between some of the show/store functions and others
is that if you look closely, you see that some make reference to global
structures, e.g., pfm_controls, or call out to routines in others modules.
For those, I have switched to the default attribute. But the other show/store
functions need to access the particular object where the kobj is embedded.
And for that, it seems you need to glue function:

#define to_pmu(n) container_of(n, struct pfm_pmu_config, kobj)

static ssize_t pfm_pmu_attr_show(struct kobject *kobj,
                struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
        struct pfm_pmu_config *pmu = to_pmu(kobj);
        struct pfm_attribute *attribute = to_attr(attr);
        return attribute->show ? attribute->show(pmu, attribute, buf) : -EIO;
}

which basically calls the container_of() routine..

Yet, I get the feeling that is the show routein gets the same kobj,
then I could as well do the
to_pmu() there. And the attr (use the the strcmp()) would be the default.

If you tell me this is the way to go, I will certainly be happy to
make the change and remove even
more code!


Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/