Re: [PATCH] HP iLO driver

[H. Peter Anvin]

Altobelli, David wrote:
> > Wouldn't /dev/hpilo/ccbN be a more appropriate namespace?
>
> Yes, that would be more clear.  The code is currently defined to a maximum of 1 hardware device, but this could change, and the dev path should probably reflect that.
>
> How do you feel about /dev/hpiloX/ccbN, where X is 0, 1, ... Num_Devices-1?

I'd rather see /dev/hpilo/dXcY, the point being to try to declutter the 
/dev root.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/