Re: workqueue cpu affinity

[Peter Zijlstra]

Sorry for being late,.. and I'm afraid most will have to wait a bit
longer :-(

On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 12:02 -0700, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Please don't take this too personal - I'm glad you're working on this.
> > I'm just trying to see what we can generalize.

> Oh, no worries, I'm not taking this personally, except maybe the "most your
> ideas suck" part which got me a little bit ;-). I'm definitely all for making
> it suitable for more general usage.
> This is actually first constructive criticism (except for the "most of your
> ideas suck" part :). 

No, no, you understand me wrong (or I expressed myself wrong). Your
ideas are good, its just the implementation / execution I have issues
with.

Like with extending the isolation map, what didn't leave any room for
hard-rt smp schedulers or multiple rt domains. Whereas the cpuset stuff
does.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/