Re: 2.6.25.3: su gets stuck for root

From: Vegard Nossum
Date: Thu Jun 12 2008 - 07:52:22 EST


On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Joe Peterson <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Joe Peterson wrote:
>> Anyway, here is more info:
>>
>> tty_check_change: current->signal->tty = f7880800
>> tty_check_change: tty = f7880800
>> tty_check_change: tty->pgrp = f7b99e40
>> tty->pgrp->count = 5
>> tty->pgrp->level = 0
>> tty->pgrp->numbers[0].nr = 6951
>> tty_check_change: task_pgrp(current) = f7b99d40
>> task_pgrp(current)->count = 1
>> task_pgrp(current)->level = 0
>> task_pgrp(current)->numbers[0].nr = 6952
>> tty_check_change: kill_pgrp called; returning -ERESTARTSYS
>> set_termios: error return value (-512) from tty_check_change
>> foo 6951 0.0 0.1 2332 1096 tty1 S+ 14:18 0:00 su foo
>> foo 6952 0.0 0.1 2988 1464 tty1 S 14:18 0:00 bash
>>
>>
>> So, looks like the tty->pgrp's process is the "su" command itself, and
>> the task_pgrp(current)'s process is "bash" - the shell started by the su.
>
> If anyone has any tips for my further debugging of this, given the
> above, let me know. I'd like to help resolve this.

I think knowing the pgrps of the above processes (there is possibly
one more involved, stty?) would be useful; try:

$ ps -eo pid,pgrp,tpgid,user,args

..as this problem occurs because a process tries to change the
terminal settings (and subsequently gets suspended because of that)
while it's not the owner of the terminal.

This can happen if you fork something off to the background, e.g. like

$ stty 9600 &

(which should immediately give you [1]+ Stopped stty 9600),

so can you please look for anything like that in your login scripts or
shell rc files?

I don't know any other way to debug this further, sorry :-(

Thanks.


Vegard

--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/