Re: [PATCH -mm 11/24] pageflag helpers for configed-out flags

[Rik van Riel]

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:01:45 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:42:25 -0400
> Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Define proper false/noop inline functions for noreclaim page
> > flags when !defined(CONFIG_NORECLAIM_LRU)
> 
> I changed that to CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU.
> 
> Did we agree that the presence of this config variable is undesirable? 
> If so, what's involved in making it go away?

We agreed that having CONFIG_NORELAIM_SWAP was bad, that one went away.

As for CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU, I believe we will want to at least give
embedded people the option to compile without all that code, similar
to CONFIG_SWAP.

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/