Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: PAT: fix ambiguous paranoia check in pat_init()

[H. Peter Anvin]

Rene Herman wrote:
> The current setup is okay really. The only thing it still wants is a 
> commandline whitelist switch but that needs a somewhat different setup 
> as validate_pat_support() is too early for __setup() or early_param().

Actually, I think it's time to nuke the whitelist.  I don't think it has 
any CPUs on it that have the PAT flag enabled, still.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/