Re: Fwd: [patch (for 2.6.26?) 1/1] cifs: fix oops on mount whenCONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is enabled

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:14:26 -0500
"Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>

argh.  smfrench@xxxxxxxxx == sfrench@xxxxxxxxxx == sfrench@xxxxxxxxxx

This always bugs me because I never know which is preferred, most
reliable, least likely to get mangled, etc.


> To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>, marcin.slusarz@xxxxxxxxx, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Fwd: [patch (for 2.6.26?) 1/1] cifs: fix oops on mount when CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is enabled
> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:14:26 -0500
> 
> I don't have the original note (ie patch without whitespace mangled by
> the mailers) that I can ack to Linus on this but would like it merged
> into mainline as an individual patch (my cifs-2.6.git tree has
> additional patches in it that I don't want to merged into
> linux-2.6.git yet).
> 

I'll send this on to Linus and stable@xxxxxxxxxx in my next batch.

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [patch (for 2.6.26?) 1/1] cifs: fix oops on mount when
> CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL is enabled
> To: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: sfrench@xxxxxxxxxx, marcin.slusarz@xxxxxxxxx, sfrench@xxxxxxxxx,
> stable@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> ACK

Please don't top-post.  It really does make it hard to keep things
vaguely coherent?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/