Re: [patch] sched: prevent bound kthreads from changing cpus_allowed

[Max Krasnyanskiy]

David Rientjes wrote:
> >  2) Sometimes calls to kthread_bind are binding to any online cpu, such as in:
> >
> > 	drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_irq.c:	kthread_bind(cct->task, any_online_cpu(cpu_online_map));
> >
> >     In such cases, the PF_THREAD_BOUND seems inappropriate.  The caller of
> >     kthread_bind() really doesn't seem to care where that thread is bound;
> >     they just want it on a CPU that is still online.
>
> This particular case is simply moving the thread to any online cpu so that 
> it survives long enough for the subsequent kthread_stop() in 
> destroy_comp_task().  So I don't see a problem with this instance.
>
> A caller to kthread_bind() can always remove PF_THREAD_BOUND itself upon 
> return, but I haven't found any cases in the tree where that is currently 
> necessary.  And doing that would defeat the semantics of kthread_bind() 
> where these threads are supposed to be bound to a specific cpu and not 
> allowed to run on others.

Actually I have another use case here. Above example in particular may be ok 
but it does demonstrate the issue nicely. Which is that in some cases kthreads 
are bound to a CPU but do not have a strict "must run here" requirement and 
could be moved if needed.
For example I need an ability to move workqueue threads. Workqueue threads do 
kthread_bind().
So how about we add something like kthread_bind_strict() which  would set 
PF_THREAD_BOUND ?
We could also simply add flags argument to the kthread_bind() which would be 
better imo but requires more changes. ie It'd look like
	kthread_bind(..., cpu, KTHREAD_BIND_STRICT);

Things like migration threads, stop machine, etc would use the strict version 
and everything else would use non-strict bind.

---
On the related note (this seems like the right crowd :). What do people think 
about kthreads and cpusets in general. We currently have a bit of a disconnect 
in the logic.
1. kthreads can be put into a cpuset at which point their cpus_allowed mask is 
updated properly
2. kthread's cpus_allowed mask is updated properly when cpuset setup changes 
(cpus added, removed, etc).
3. kthreads inherit cpuset from a parent (kthreadd for example) _but_  they 
either do kthread_bind() or set_cpus_allowed() and both of those simply ignore 
inherited cpusets.

Notice how scenario #3 does not fit into the overall picture. The behaviour is 
inconsistent.
How about this:
- Split sched_setaffinity into

	sched_setaffinity()
	{
		task *p = get_task_by_pid();
		return task_setaffinity(p);
	}

	task_setaffinity(task, cpumask, flags)
	{
		if (flags & FORCE) {
			// Used for kthreads that require strict binding.
			// Detach the task from the current cpuset
			// and put it into the root cpuset.
  			// Set PF_THREAD_BOUND.
		}

		// Rest of the original sched_setaffinity logic
	}

- Have kthreads call task_setaffinity() instead of set_cpus_allowed() directly.
That way the behaviour will be consistent across the board.

Comments ?

Max

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/