On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:14:00AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:13:13 +0300
"Catalin(ux) M BOIE" <catab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is a no-name PCI card. I found no reference to a producer so IWe don't really want to get fake names into pci_ids. I'd rather
used the fake name "PDR".
.vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX,Either the hex or a local and obviously unknown name like ID_UNKNOWN_1
+ .device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_PLX_9050,
+ .subvendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX,
+ .subdevice = PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_PDR,
+ pbn_plx_pdr,_unknown1
pbn_oxsemi,Ditto
pbn_intel_i960,
pbn_sgi_ioc3,
@@ -1186,6 +1196,13 @@ static struct pciserial_board pci_boards[] __devinitdata = {
.base_baud = 115200,
.uart_offset = 8,
},
+ /* PDR */
+ [pbn_plx_pdr] = {
+ /* PDR */Ditto
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX, PCI_DEVICE_ID_PLX_9050,Ditto
+ PCI_VENDOR_ID_PLX,
+ PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_PDR, 0, 0,
+#define PCI_SUBDEVICE_ID_PDR 0x1584And not in here at all.
+
And there's no need for half the patch either - which I tried to explain
in a previous reply to Catalin but I just got repeated "My email address
has changed to ..." responses... so I gave up.