Re: [PATCH -mm 13/25] Noreclaim LRU Infrastructure

[Rik van Riel]

On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 16:54:34 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ho hum.  Can you remind us what problems this patchset actually
> addresses?  Preferably in order of seriousness?

Here are some other problems that my patch series can easily fix,
because file cache and anon/swap backed pages live on separate
LRUs:

http://feedblog.org/2007/09/29/using-o_direct-on-linux-and-innodb-to-fix-swap-insanity/

http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2008/05/01/mysql-and-the-linux-swap-problem/

I do not know for sure whether the patch set does fix it yet for
everyone, or whether it needs some more tuning first, but it is
fairly easily fixable by tweaking the relative pressure on both
sets of LRU lists.

No tricks of skipping over one type of pages while scanning, or
treating the referenced bits differently when the moon is in some
particular phase required - one set of lists for each type of
pages, and variable pressure between the two.

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/