Re: [patch 2/3] Add flags parameter to reserve_bootmem_generic()

From: WANG Cong
Date: Sun Jun 08 2008 - 10:30:34 EST


On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 03:46:30PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
>This patch adds a 'flags' parameter to reserve_bootmem_generic() like it
>already has been added in reserve_bootmem() with commit
>72a7fe3967dbf86cb34e24fbf1d957fe24d2f246.
>
>It also changes all users to use BOOTMEM_DEFAULT, which doesn't effectively
>change the behaviour. Since the change is x86-specific, I don't think it's
>necessary to add a new API for migration. There are only 4 users of that
>function.
>
>The change is necessary for the next patch, using reserve_bootmem_generic()
>for crashkernel reservation.
>
>
>Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@xxxxxxx>
>
>---
> arch/x86/kernel/e820_64.c | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/efi_64.c | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/mpparse.c | 5 +++--
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> include/asm-x86/proto.h | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820_64.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820_64.c
>@@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ void __init early_res_to_bootmem(unsigne
> continue;
> printk(KERN_INFO " early res: %d [%lx-%lx] %s\n", i,
> final_start, final_end - 1, r->name);
>- reserve_bootmem_generic(final_start, final_end - final_start);
>+ reserve_bootmem_generic(final_start, final_end - final_start,
>+ BOOTMEM_DEFAULT);
> }
> }
>
>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/efi_64.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/efi_64.c
>@@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ void __init efi_call_phys_epilog(void)
> void __init efi_reserve_bootmem(void)
> {
> reserve_bootmem_generic((unsigned long)memmap.phys_map,
>- memmap.nr_map * memmap.desc_size);
>+ memmap.nr_map * memmap.desc_size,
>+ BOOTMEM_DEFAULT);
> }

Just one comment.

Since 'reserve_bootmem_generic' is changed from 'void' to 'int',
we should check its return value for failure when possible, right?


--
Hi, I'm a .signature virus, please copy/paste me to help me spread
all over the world.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/