Re: [intel-agp] Rewrite GTT on resume

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sun Jun 08 2008 - 03:14:21 EST


Hi!

> From 26b58f13ecbe95a7eaca7434aeb885def057b835 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:34:54 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] [INTEL-AGP] Re-write GATT on resume
>
> Keep a list of current GATT mappings. At resume time, rewrite them into the
> GATT. This is needed on Intel (at least) as the entire GATT is cleared
> across suspend/resume. The list is protected by a spinlock.

Is this needed in case of iommu enabled, agp disabled, too?

> diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
> index eeea50a..7f1a96e 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
> @@ -2176,6 +2176,7 @@ static void __devexit agp_intel_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> static int agp_intel_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct agp_bridge_data *bridge = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + int ret_val;
>
> pci_restore_state(pdev);
>
> @@ -2203,6 +2204,10 @@ static int agp_intel_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> else if (bridge->driver == &intel_i965_driver)
> intel_i915_configure();
>
> + ret_val = agp_rebind_memory();
> + if (ret_val != 0)
> + return ret_val;
> +
> return 0;
> }
> #endif

Should this move early (sysdev?) because other drivers may depend on
iommu working?

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/