Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings for the week of May 30th 2008

[Dave Jones]

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:55:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
 > 
 > 
 > On Fri, 30 May 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
 > > 
 > > versions that do identify themselves as "2.6.25-14.fc9.i686.PAE", and 
 > > these ones didn't, (they're all in the "2.6.25-14.fc9.i686" form) so 
 > > this is a kernel without PAE.
 > 
 > Hmm. Every single one is that one kernel version or 2.6.25.3-18.fc9.i686, 
 > and with that many reports I'd have expected it from other kernels too. 
 > What was the previous popular fc9 kernel (I assume it was 2.6.25-based 
 > too?), and what changed?

-14 is the version that we released F9 with, which explains its popularity.
-18 was the first update we pushed out within the first few days..

The earlier f9 builds were only beaten on by people testing our development
tree, which is nowhere near as many as what jump on a proper release.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/