Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover,performance.
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Wed May 14 2008 - 15:08:32 EST
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
That can be the case if client connects to some gate server, which in
turn broadcasts data further, that is how I plan to implement things at
first.
That means you are less optimal than the direct-to-storage-server path
in NFSv4.1, then........
<waves red flag in front of the bull>
If access controls permit, the ideal would be for the client to avoid an
intermediary when storing data. The client only _needs_ a consensus
reply that their transaction was committed. They don't necessarily need
an intermediary to do the boring data transfer work.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/