Re: [git pull] x86 fixes

From: Andres Salomon
Date: Wed May 07 2008 - 15:44:43 EST


On Wed, 7 May 2008 21:08:40 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > Sorry, this should not have gone mainline. We had your patch
> > > queued (via Andrew) and it had testing failures, which we sent to
> > > you. One workaround was that build patch. When we dropped your
> > > patch we forgot to remove the workaround as well.
> > >
> >
> > Will it be removed, then? I haven't seen any explanation of its
> > benefits, and Adrian's point about not catching build failures in
> > olpc_battery is valid.
>
> Yes, it's scheduled for the next pull request. What's the state of the
> build failures of your original patch ?
>
> Thanks,
> tglx


They're queued up in Andrew's tree, I believe. You were also CC'd;
Message-ID: <20080504104756.3d7b6842@ephemeral>. It wasn't CC'd to
lkml, unfortunately.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/