Re: [PATCH] Fix cpuset sched_relax_domain_level control file

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue May 06 2008 - 22:09:29 EST


On Tue, 6 May 2008 20:58:52 -0500 Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Paul M wrote:
> > I was just trying to get close to the original behaviour.
>
> An honorable goal.
>
> Li Zefan - would you be interested in generating a patch
> that fails -EINVAL for inputs outside the range of [-1 ... N]
> for whatever small positive N the kernel recognizes?

I'd like to get Paul's patch into mainline this evening, to give us a
chance to get the subsequent mess sorted out in time for next
linux-next[*]. So there's no rush on this update.

[*] Judging by this:

kernel/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_common_file_write':
kernel/cpuset.c:1374: warning: passing argument 3 of 'update_flag' makes integer from pointer without a cast
kernel/cpuset.c: In function 'cpuset_destroy':
kernel/cpuset.c:1793: warning: passing argument 3 of 'update_flag' makes integer from pointer without a cast

Paul should drop sched-devel. I'm suspecting it contains stale old stuff
which wasn't supposed to be there.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/