Re: on CONFIG_MM_OWNER=y, kernel panic is possible.

From: Balbir Singh
Date: Tue May 06 2008 - 02:30:09 EST


KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>> That is not possible. If you look at where mm_update_next_owner() is called
>>> from, we call it from
>>>
>>> exit_mm() and exec_mmap()
>>>
>>> In both cases, we ensure that the task's mm has changed (to NULL and the new mm
>>> respectively), before we call mm_update_next_owner(), hence c->mm can never be
>>> equal to p->mm.
>> if so, following patch is needed instead.
>
> and, one more.
>
> comment of owner member of mm_struct is bogus.
> that is not guranteed point to thread-group-leader.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> include/linux/mm_types.h | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> ===================================================================
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h 2008-05-04 22:56:52.000000000 +0900
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h 2008-05-06 15:53:04.000000000 +0900
> @@ -231,8 +231,7 @@ struct mm_struct {
> rwlock_t ioctx_list_lock; /* aio lock */
> struct kioctx *ioctx_list;
> #ifdef CONFIG_MM_OWNER
> - struct task_struct *owner; /* The thread group leader that */
> - /* owns the mm_struct. */
> + struct task_struct *owner; /* point to one of task that owns the mm_struct. */
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>
>
>

How about just, the task that owns the mm_struct? One of, implies multiple owners.


--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/