Re: [RFC] x86: x86-64defconfig remake

[Paul Jackson]

Cyrill wrote:
> The current x86_64_defconfig contains a number of nonexistent
> symbols.

These symbols don't exist in what context?

The one I notice:

-# CONFIG_CPUSETS is not set

certainly exists, in init/Kconfig:

    config CPUSETS
	bool "Cpuset support"
	depends on SMP && CGROUPS

and is enabled by default in some configs:

    arch/ia64/configs/sn2_defconfig
    arch/mips/configs/ip27_defconfig
    arch/mips/configs/sb1250-swarm_defconfig
    arch/powerpc/configs/cell_defconfig
    arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig
    arch/powerpc/configspseries_defconfig

I could be tempted to enable cpusets by default in x86_64
as well, however I don't understand the tradeoffs of such
a change well enough to know if I should propose that.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/