Re: 'global' rq->clock

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

> on nohz we still keep jiffies uptodate - despite there not being an 
> explicit 'keep jiffies uptodate' tick interrupt anymore. So on every 
> irq_enter() we roll jiffies forward - if needed - and thus emulate 
> jiffies behavior to drivers and core kernel code, etc.
> 
> if an IPI on Power does not do an irq_enter() then you might miss out on 
> updated jiffies. That might not matter for most jiffies, but you might 
> also miss out on the 'touch the softlockup watchdog because we just woke 
> from idle' action. This is what triggered the false positive warnings on 
> Sparc64.
> 
> the same bug existed on x86 too: that too does a few IPIs without 
> irq_enter/irq_exit. We now removed the softlockup dependency so it 
> should not be required to do an irq_enter()/exit anymore - unless the 
> code that the IPI uses accesses jiffies. (but that would be unusual)

Allright, so it looks like we don't have a problem today, though I'll be
careful if some of our CPUs come up with more fancy ways to do IPIs.
Currently they are just normal interrupts, so we do irq_enter/exit and
we process softirqs on the way out.

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/