Re: [POWERPC][v2] Bolt in SLB entry for kernel stack on secondarycpus

[Paul Mackerras]

David Gibson writes:

> Do you even need the processor ID test at all?  The boot processor
> should always have its stack covered by SLB entry 0 when we come
> through here, shouldn't it?

I was concerned that get_paca()->kstack wouldn't have been initialized
by the time the boot cpu calls slb_initialize().  If that fear is
unfounded then the check could go.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/