Re: Btrfs v0.14 Released

From: Jeff Mahoney
Date: Thu May 01 2008 - 15:27:38 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote:
>
> [ btrfs oops on ubuntu ]
>
>>>> This is because ubuntu kernels ship with apparmor, you'll need this
>>>> patch:
>>>>
>>>> If there is a #ifdef IM_A_UBUNTU_KERNEL I can use, I'll do it. Jeff
>>>> Mahoney has a similar patch for SUSE that I've been meaning to merge,
>>>> but I wanted to lookup some way to check for ubuntu as well.
>>>>
>>>> -chris
>>>>
>>>> diff -r e7da2489b19b file.c
>>>> --- a/file.c Wed Apr 30 13:59:35 2008 -0400
>>>> +++ b/file.c Thu May 01 12:25:11 2008 -0400
>>>> @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write(struct f
>>>> goto out_nolock;
>>>> if (count == 0)
>>>> goto out_nolock;
>>>> - err = remove_suid(fdentry(file));
>>>> + err = remove_suid(&file->f_path);
>>>> if (err)
>>>> goto out_nolock;
>>>> file_update_time(file);
>> Couldn't you #ifdef based on CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR ? This ought to
>> work for Hardy. However the next development kernel (Intrepid) does not
>> have the APPARMOR patches, so just knowing that its an UBUNTU kernel is
>> not specific enough.
>
> I've been assuming the apparmor patches change remove_suid even when they are
> not enabled in the config.

Yeah, unless Ubuntu is doing some magic with the function arguments
(which sounds like the fix is worse than the problem), this is true.

- -Jeff

- --
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIGhmULPWxlyuTD7IRAgJcAJ4zYYcgQ2V0eT6Fv6LstlwpnK9bUwCgpdBD
XHUzfiFBd+HQLt5Tw5vHH0A=
=KWIZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/