Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add API for weak DMA masks

[Michael Buesch]

On Thursday 01 May 2008 17:58:26 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 05:47:26PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > We've discussed that and this behaviour is not acceptable, as the driver
> > must know about a possible fallback in case it can do 32bit DMA
> > more efficiently than 64bit DMA, for example.
> 
> That's what we have dma_get_required_mask() for.  See
> Documentation/DMA-API.txt.

So well. I'm still unsure about the advantage of having some opencoded
probe loop in the driver, instead of implementing it in a common place
and doing all of it with a single API call.
We can still call dma_get_required_mask() and adjust the mask to that
in dma_set_mask_weak(). That can _additionally_ be done there.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/