Re: [RFC] Kernel naming convention in the merge phase

[Oliver Hartkopp]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> > i wonder about the Kernel naming convention in the merge phase before
> > the -rc1 is officially tagged by Linus.
> >
> > Won't it be more precisely to name the current snapshot
> > 2.6.26-merge-git16 instead of 2.6.25-git16?
> >
> > It is not that i would suggest to have a new git tag in this merge 
> > phase but only the Makefile should be changed at the beginning of 
> > this phase to identify the ongoing work for the 2.6.26:
> >
> > (..)
> >
> > Introducing the new '-merge' version _that_ early helps to avoid the 
> > version confusion in /lib/modules and also allows people to work with 
> > kernel version depended stuff in a very early phase.
>
> And it'll break all the robotic stuff again.
>
> Foo-gitX has always been a development snapshot which *follows* Foo.

Hm - if it breaks the robotic stuff, there could be a real 
"v2.6.26-merge" git tag which shouldn't break like "v2.6.26-rc1".

It could look like this:

- tag v2.6.25
- drink a beer
- tag v2.6.26-merge
- pull the new stuff from subsystem maintainers
- tag v2.6.26-rc1
- ...

For me a 2.6.25-gitX looks like a snapshot that leads to a 2.6.25.1 and 
_not_ to a 2.6.26-rc1. The current 2.6.25-git16 is moch more a 2.6.26 
than a 2.6.25. So v2.6.26-merge-git16 makes it much clearer what's going 
on here.

To tag Linus' tree with v2.6.26-merge before pulling all the new 2.6.26 
stuff seems therefore reasonable to me. But maybe i don't have all the 
dependencies on my radar.

Regards,
Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/