Re: make cloneconfig ?

[Jesper Juhl]

On 24/04/2008, devzero@xxxxxx <devzero@xxxxxx> wrote:
> any reason why "make cloneconfig" never made it into mainline?
>
>  many people are quite used to it and every time i build vanilla kernel i step into that trap  "oh - that`s a suse`ism"
>
>  make cloneconfig exists since /proc/config.gz - but while that one went into mainline, cloneconfig never did.
>
>  anyone know the reason for that ?
>
>  i wished, distros kernels were more similar to vanilla kernels - so what about making them more similar ?
>
>

Isn't "cloneconfig" basically just "zcat /proc/config.gz > .config &&
make oldconfig" ???   If so, why do we need yet another "make
<some_target>" Makefile rule? What would actually be gained?

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/