Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS

From: Kyle McMartin
Date: Tue Apr 22 2008 - 11:42:27 EST


On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:38:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> >
> > This should (imnsho, at least),
> >         1 - Add a cond_syscall for sys_sysfs to sys_ni.c
> >         2 - Use a CONFIG_EMBEDDED dependent option that defaults on,
> >             possibly depend on BLACKFIN if you really want to.
> >
> > Adding this junk to every arch header is, in my opinion, completely
> > unacceptable just because blackfin wants to be different.
>
> It's not that they want to be different, but rather that I (among others)
> requested that they don't implement obsolete syscalls, so they removed it
> from their syscall table.
>

Ah, I stupidly assumed sys_sysfs was something to do with /sys.

regards, Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/