Re: cdrom: use kmalloced buffers instead of buffers on stack

From: FUJITA Tomonori
Date: Tue Apr 22 2008 - 07:47:51 EST


On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:48:58 +0200
tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Thomas Bogendoerfer) wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:01:26PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > cdrom: use kmalloced buffers instead of buffers on stack
> > >
> > > If cdrom commands are issued to a scsi drive in most cases the buffer
> > > will be
> > > filled via dma. This leads to bad stack corruption on non coherent
> > > platforms,
> > > because the buffers are neither cache line aligned nor is the size a
> > > multiple
> > > of the cache line size. Using kmalloced buffers avoids this.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >---
> > > drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c | 274
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> >
> > Eh... AFAICS this is only really useful in two of the cases converted.
> >
> > For all the other cases (<= 32 bytes), it is _far_ less complex, far
> > less code to simply communicate the additional alignment requirements to
> > the compiler.
> >
> > What about __attribute__ __aligned__? Was that tried?
>
> I used that while narrowing down the bug. But not only the alignment is
> important, but also size needs to be a multiple of the cache line size.
> Which means it needs to be 128 bytes for most SGI machines. That
> and the following in DMA-mapping.txt
>
> "This rule also means that you may use neither kernel image addresses
> (items in data/text/bss segments), nor module image addresses, nor
> stack addresses for DMA."
>
> let me choose the kmalloc() solution.

Can we advertise such architecture's dma restrictions? For example, if
we can update dma_pad_mask and dma_alignment in request_queue,
blk_rq_map_kern uses a proper bounce buffer for such
architectures. Then we can avoid putting extra complexity in uppper
drivers such as cdrom.c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/