Re: [PATCH] mos7840: test and propagate set_uart_reg return value

[SL Baur]

On 4/16/08, Roel Kluin <12o3l@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The test for an mos7840_set_uart_reg() error return value only works when
>  status is signed. propagate its error value.
>
>  Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@xxxxxxxxxx>
>  ---
>
>  diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c
>  index aeeb9cb..ef1ede2 100644
>  --- a/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c
>  +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/mos7840.c
>  @@ -1713,7 +1713,7 @@ static int mos7840_tiocmset(struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *file,
>   {
>         struct moschip_port *mos7840_port;
>         unsigned int mcr;
>  -       unsigned int status;
>  +       int status;
>
>         dbg("%s - port %d", __FUNCTION__, port->number);
>
>  @@ -1739,11 +1739,10 @@ static int mos7840_tiocmset(struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *file,
>
>         mos7840_port->shadowMCR = mcr;
>
>  -       status = 0;
>         status = mos7840_set_uart_reg(port, MODEM_CONTROL_REGISTER, mcr);
>         if (status < 0) {
>                 dbg("setting MODEM_CONTROL_REGISTER Failed\n");
>  -               return -1;
>  +               return status;
>         }
>
>         return 0;

O.K.  I can see you're changing types to properly match the function return
values.  May I ask why you didn't change mos7840_tiocmget the same way?

-sb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/