Re: [PATCH] cgroup: fix a race condition in manipulating tsk->cg_list

[Li Zefan]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:17:34 -0700 "Paul Menage" <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Andrew Morton
>> <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>  I don't fully understand the race.  Both paths hold css_set_lock.
>>>
>>>  Can you describe it in more detail please?
>> Task A starts exiting, passes the check for unlinking current->cg_list.
> 
> So cgroup_exit() sees !list_empty(tsk->cg_list)
> 

cgroup_exit() sees list_empty(tsk->cg_list), then cgroup_enable_task_cg_list()
links the task to the list, and then the task exited, so the list entry won't
get deleted.

> And the list_del() sets tsk->cg_list to LIST_POISON[12], which still means
> !list_empty().  Or we remove that debugging code and avoid writing to
> tsk->cg_list, and it _still_ is !list_empty().
> 
>> Before it completely exits task B does the very first
>> cgroup_iter_begin() call (via reading a cgroups tasks file) which
>> links all tasks in to their css_set objects via tsk->cg_list.
> 
> But it won't link this task, because it's !list_empty().
> 
>> Then task A finishes exiting and is freed, but doesn't unlink from the cg_list.
>>
>>>  afacit the task at *p could set PF_EXITING immediately after this code has
>>>  tested PF_EXITING and then the task at *p could proceed until we hit the
>>>  same race (whatever that is).
>> The important fact there is that the task sets PF_EXITING *before* it
>> checks whether it needs to unlink from current->cg_list.
>>
>> Paul
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/