Re: Recreating RAID1 after the reckless mdadm usage

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Artem S. Tashkinov <birdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2008.04.03.0746 +0200]:
> mdadm --create --assume-clean --verbose /dev/md0 --level=1 --force  
> --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda1 missing (which is obviously the right command).
>
> After doing that I see that my data on a recreated /dev/md0 is there (It  
> seems like it's intact). Is it safe to use this RAID1 and is my data  
> safe? Can I now add the second block device to md0 using 'mdadm /dev/md0  
> -a /dev/sdb1' command?

Looks good. Although you should not use --force or --assume-clean,
you wouldn't have needed them, but they also don't make a difference
in the above command.

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
the united nations did a poll about food. the only question they asked
was: "could you please give your honest opinion about a solution for
the shortage of food in the rest of the world?" this poll failed
because:
  - in africa they didn't know what food was....
  - in eastern-europe they didn't know what honest was....
  - in western-europe they didn't know what shortage was...
  - in china they didn't know what opinion was...
  - in the middle-east they didn't know what solution was...
  - in south-america they didn't know what please was...
  - and in the usa they didn't know what "the rest of the world" was...
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)