Re: UBIFS vs Logfs (was [RFC PATCH] UBIFS - new flash file system)

[Artem Bityutskiy]

JÃrn Engel wrote:
> About a year ago I would have used roughly the same argument.  But in
> the meanwhile I have accepted the fact that any piece of flash I'll use
> in a notebook in the next five years will likely use SATA or USB as a
> transport medium.

Well, Thomasz was talking not about the transport I believe. If you have a
raw flash access via SATA or USB, then this is handled on the driver level
and does not any require FS support. JFFS2 or UBIFS may also work with such a
device, because it is just raw flash. But I know that you know that most of
the FTL-enabled stuff does not give use raw flash access.

--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÑÑÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/