Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86_64 boot -v2: Add linked list of structsetup_data

[Paul Jackson]

Huang wrote:
> +/* setup data types */
> +#define SETUP_NONE			0

This define seems unused?

Actually, what use would it ever have?  Should not every
struct setup_data on the setup_data linked list have a
valid (not NONE) type?  And perhaps that switch statement
that confused me:

> +		switch (data->type) {
> +		default:
> +			break;
> +		}

should not "break" silently on an unrecognized data->type, but
rather complain bitterly?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/