Re: 2.6.25-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.24

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10153
> > > Subject		: (regression) kernel/timeconst.h bugs with HZ=128
> > > Submitter	: David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date		: 2008-02-26 19:32 (31 days old)
> > > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/26/294
> > > Handled-By	: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Patch		: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15114&amp;action=view
> > > 		  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15115&amp;action=view
> > 
> > Have those patches made it somewhere else than into the bugzilla ?
> 
> I don't think so.

They touch a bunch of files but they are pretty straight forward and
obvious. OTOH HZ=128 is not really anyway near to a default config and
I think we can safely postpone that one to .26

@hpa: can you please post them on LKML so they don't settle dust in
the bugzilla ?

Thanks,
	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/