Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10326] New: inconsistent lock state innet_rx_action

From: David Miller
Date: Thu Mar 27 2008 - 17:44:33 EST


From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:32:48 +0100

> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:59:02PM +0100, Marcus Better wrote:
> > David Miller wrote:
> >> Can some test if using local_irq_{save,restore}() in
> >> napi_complete() cures this lockdep warning?
>
> Isn't it now justified enough without lockdep's ack?

Absolutely, but I want to know that the problem is solved
and confirmed by a tester.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/